Sacred Sexuality
15 Do you not know
that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members
of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16 Do
you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in
body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.” 17 But
whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
18 Flee from
sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but
whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body. 19 Do
you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you,
whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20 you
were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies.
1
Corinthians 6 (NIV)
Your Body is Sacred
I grew up in an age of dedicated efforts to keep Christian
kids pure.[1] Every youth retreat or conference I went to
had a pointed emphasis on committing us to our own purity. Purity was the emphasis of bible studies,
Sunday school, youth group, and Sunday sermons.
I remember one youth pastor who spray-painted "SEX" on a cinder block,
railed for an hour about how horrible sex was for us, and then smashed the
thing with a sledge hammer. My
church-world was saturated with the message: YOU MUST STAY PURE!!!![2]
As I’ve grown older I’ve grown more frustrated with those
lessons. What I remember feels so empty
now. It’s as if they were telling us to
grow into a full, vibrant, mature tree and then held up a wimpy stick as our
example of a good tree. What I mean is,
for these well-meaning Christian educators abstinence was the whole story. Just
don’t have sex and you’ll be fine, was what we all heard. I think for the New Testament purity is only part
of the story. The other part is
sacredness. And not just the sacredness
of sex, but the sacredness of our own bodies.
As Paul wrote here in 1 Corinthians, when we sin sexually we
actually hurt ourselves. We give our
body less than it deserves or at least less than it needs. Here’s my basic conviction: sex is symbolic;
symbolic of the best of marriage. It’s a
husband and wife giving themselves wholly to one another. The physical wholeness represents the
wholeness of body, mind, soul, and strength in the rest of life. For most of us, we deeply need this kind of
whole love.[3] Our bodies are so sacred that they deserve a
lifetime of love and support. Sex at its
best reinforces, therefore, how sacred we each are. Sex that relies on anything less than this
full commitment does the exact opposite—it serves to cause us to feel very
unsacred.
In case you don’t believe me, how did you feel the last time
someone broke up with you? Used? Unworthy?
Devalued? Even if you didn’t have
sex, the breakup strikes at your deeply seated need to know that you are
sacred. It wounds you. My assumption is that repeated sexual
encounters not propped up by commitment may make us think our body is a
commodity, to be bartered for with drinks and gifts or witty remarks, something
far from the sacred reality of how we were created. [4]
Part of Paul’s point is that we were each bought by Christ’s
precious sacrifice and so we must treat our bodies as if they are indeed worth
such a high cost. We are not to be given
away easily, not for anything less than lifelong commitment. Jesus has received
us into His Kingdom with a promise to never leave us. He has given himself entirely, to the point
of death, to us. So too, our sexuality
is a gift to be given entirely, to the point of death, to our spouse. And when lived out in good faith, that’s
really, really good for us.
Who would say, “Having the same person give me their total
commitment for a life time, yeah, that sounds lackluster?” Unfortunately, I
think many people in our world do have serious doubts about the benefits of
monogamy. I wonder if part of that is because
they, like us, have seen lots and lots of marriages not live up to such ideals.
Many have seen selfishness as the model for marriage. And selfish sex within marriage is as bad or
worse than any other kind of sexual immorality.
Sex that centers on propping up a sense of self-entitlement is the
antithesis of what I would call biblical sexuality.
But how many Christians have been taught this? How many Christian teens venture into sexual
encounters with little or no sense of God’s design except to know that they’re
probably sinning?
How many Christians really believe that our bodies are
sacred, so sacred that nothing will do except lifelong mutually gifted
commitment? My guess is that many Christians think about sex as either that
pleasurable thing they do with their spouse or that thing the bible says they
are obligated to do with their spouse. I think the beautiful symbolism is often
lost.
But when we lose the symbolism, I think we also lose our
sacredness.
[1]
I’m not sure that age is over just yet.
[2] It
always felt like an all-out assault on sex.
Not just pre-marital sex, but on sex.
In fact, I have heard of more than a handful of Christian couples who
couldn’t bring themselves to be intimate for several days after their wedding
night, because they were too afraid that they might be sinning.
[3] I
say most, because I do believe in the gift of celibacy. Sometimes I wonder if our hypersexual world
causes people who have this gift to not have room to recognize it.
[4] A
significant percentage of our teens, Christian and otherwise, are sexually
active. A significant portion of them
also struggle with self-doubt. I’m
convinced that this is no coincidence.
If you don’t believe that you are worth a lifetime, you won’t wait
around.
Comments
Post a Comment