Diminishing Distances
16For it is clear that
he did not come to help angels, but the descendants of Abraham. 17Therefore he had to become like
his brothers and sisters in every respect, so that he might be a merciful and
faithful high priest in the service of God, to make a sacrifice of atonement for
the sins of the people. 18Because he himself was tested by what he
suffered, he is able to help those who are being tested.
Hebrews 2 (NRSV)
I hate arrogance.
When I see a clear example of it I often make a note to shun the
offender. It is an imprint on my DNA to
avoid arrogant people at all cost . . . to keep them at a distance and even
increase the distance at every opportunity.[1] I find pride to be shaming, destructive, and
at the heart of everything that’s wrong with the Church.
I imagine you too have some kind of moral discrepancy that
grates against your preferences. Perhaps
you loathe personal irresponsibility. Or
you avoid the greedy. Or you can’t stand
liars.
Flee from evil, right?
I remember being taught that God is holy and God cannot be
in the company of evil. I have a hunch
that I know where this comes from, but I can’t think of anywhere in the New
Testament that explicates such an idea.[2] Instead, it seems to me, that much of the New
Testament is about the work of Christ to undo the distance between his holiness
and the unholy. Whereas I hold the
arrogant at more than arms-length, Christ passes the unpassable divide in
search of them.
Light piercing the darkness. |
This second chapter of Hebrews is about this diminishing
work of Christ—diminishing the distance between creator and creation, that is.
So much so, that Jesus becomes a creation.[3] And with his human nature he subjects himself
to all the suffering of human life. He
tastes the bitter sap of evil. He drinks from the grime encrusted cup of broken
relationships. He is crushed under the
weight of inescapable, prejudicial, merciless human death. He takes on our sin,
our shame, our brokenness, our aches, and nightmares and conquers the darkness
of this age with his sacrifice.
Rejoice that I am not God.[4] Be glad that my tendency to ostracize
particular sinners is not the operative notion of the Creator.
On the other hand, what if?
What if he approached us the way I approach the arrogant?
I won’t take that
incarnational leap, I just hate Pharisaical litigation. Have you ever smelled a leper? Their sexual deviance makes my skin
crawl! I will not drink from the same
well!
Whew! Lucky us. [5]
My salvation hinges upon grace that diminishes distances. So it seems to me that part of my discipleship
has to be incarnational. That is,
modeled upon Jesus’ move to be close to his creation. I cannot allow my prejudice toward the
arrogant to live unchallenged in me. I
must abide in the one who travelled through space and time to impart his grace
to me. I must cling to the Spirit that
continually offers transformative grace to my . . . um, arrogance.
How great is God! How
tremendous the love that conquers the divide.
How life changing the grace that reaches the ugliest corners of souls. How wonderful the cross that wipes away my
sin and the sin of those that frustrate me. How precious the blood poured out
for friends and enemies. What a merciful
and faithful high priest!
May and we all be shaped by such grace!
[1] Never
mind that this is a rather arrogant perspective.
[2]
That doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t there, but surely we must admit that
there’s an awful lot of evidence of God through Christ interacting with sinful
people.
[3]
The comparison between Christ and the Jewish high priest is prevalent in
Hebrews. The priest was a representative
of the people who offered intercessory sacrifices before God on behalf of the
people. The sacrificial system was one
of tremendous separation between the people and God. The High Priest was the
singular link between common Jews and God. Christ undoes the sacrificial system
with his own sacrifice. Additionally,
Christ becomes an intersection between God and creation. He is God and he is human. This fulfills the priestly duty in an
intimate, effective way that the old system could never accomplish. At least
that’s the way I understand what’s happening in Hebrews.
[4] Or
roll your eyes that I had the audacity to even write such a thing.
[5] I
think it is worth noting that most other notions of God do operate the way I
operate. The ancient pagan gods were
thought to be fickle and would only interact with those humans who could rise
to their expectations. Perhaps that’s
why Christian churches remain very tempted by this perspective.
Comments
Post a Comment